Damages and Remedies
Consequential Damages
Also: Indirect Damages, Special Damages, Lost Profits, Incidental Damages · Indirect Damages, Special Damages, Lost Profits, Incidental Damages, Downstream Losses
Consequential damages are losses that result from a breach of contract but go beyond the immediate, direct harm — such as lost profits, lost business opportunities, or downstream losses caused by the failure.
Many commercial contracts exclude consequential damages, limiting recovery to direct losses only.
Lawyer Explanation
Consequential damages — also called indirect or special damages — are losses that do not flow directly and immediately from the breach itself, but rather from the specific circumstances of the non-breaching party that were foreseeable at the time of contracting.
The distinction between direct and consequential damages is significant because commercial agreements frequently exclude consequential damages. A consequential damages exclusion can dramatically limit the non-breaching party's recovery, particularly in cases involving lost profits or business disruption.
Whether a particular loss is direct or consequential depends on the nature of the contract, the breach, and applicable law.
What It Actually Does
A consequential damages exclusion answers: "Even if you can prove we breached the contract and caused you losses, which categories of those losses can you actually recover?" For example, if a software vendor's system failure causes a customer to lose significant business revenue, the customer's lost profits may be consequential damages. If the contract excludes consequential damages, the customer may be limited to recovering the direct cost of the system failure — not the downstream business losses.
Why It Matters
Consequential damages can dwarf direct damages in many commercial disputes. A relatively small contract may involve a vendor whose failure causes the customer to lose far more in downstream business losses than the contract itself was worth.
A consequential damages exclusion can shift that risk entirely to the non-breaching party. For that reason, the exclusion should be read carefully alongside limitation-of-liability provisions, indemnification obligations, and the overall risk allocation of the agreement.
Example
A company relies on a cloud-based platform to process customer orders. The platform experiences a significant outage during a peak sales period, causing the company to lose $500,000 in sales.
The agreement between the company and the platform vendor contains a consequential damages exclusion. The company may be limited to recovering the direct cost of the outage — such as service credits or fees paid — rather than the full $500,000 in lost sales.
Common Language You May See
"In no event shall either party be liable for any indirect, incidental, special, consequential, or punitive damages, including lost profits or loss of business, arising out of or related to this Agreement, even if advised of the possibility of such damages."
What Stewart Law Looks For
- Does the contract exclude consequential damages?
- Does the exclusion apply to both parties or only one?
- What categories of damages are excluded — consequential, incidental, special, punitive, lost profits?
- Are there any carve-outs to the exclusion?
- Does the exclusion apply to all claims or only certain types of claims?
- How does the exclusion interact with the limitation-of-liability cap?
- Does the exclusion apply to indemnification obligations?
- Are there any circumstances where consequential damages remain recoverable?
- Does the exclusion apply to tort claims as well as contract claims?
- Is the exclusion mutual?
Common Red Flags
A consequential damages provision deserves closer attention when it:
- excludes consequential damages for one party while leaving the other party's consequential damages exposure uncapped
- is so broadly drafted that it effectively eliminates all meaningful remedies
- fails to address whether the exclusion applies to indemnification obligations
- conflicts with a liquidated damages clause that is intended to compensate for consequential losses
- excludes lost profits in a contract where lost profits are the primary foreseeable harm from a breach
- is silent on whether the exclusion applies to tort claims
Perspectives
Customer / Buyer
The party at risk of suffering consequential losses will generally want to preserve the right to recover lost profits and other downstream damages, or at minimum ensure that the exclusion is mutual and that indemnification obligations are not subject to the exclusion.
Vendor / Seller
The party providing services or products will generally want a broad consequential damages exclusion to limit exposure to downstream losses that may far exceed the contract value.
Florida & Federal Considerations
Florida
Florida courts generally enforce consequential damages exclusions in commercial agreements between sophisticated parties. Whether a specific loss is characterized as direct or consequential depends on the facts and the nature of the contract.
Florida's Uniform Commercial Code addresses the exclusion of consequential damages in transactions involving the sale of goods.
Related Terms
Contracts Where You'll Commonly See It
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between direct damages and consequential damages?
Direct damages are losses that flow naturally and immediately from the breach itself. Consequential damages are losses that result from the specific circumstances of the non-breaching party — such as lost profits or lost business opportunities — that were foreseeable at the time of contracting.
Are lost profits always consequential damages?
Not necessarily. Whether lost profits are direct or consequential depends on the nature of the contract and the circumstances. In some cases, lost profits may be the direct and natural result of a breach. In others, they may be consequential. The distinction matters when a contract excludes consequential damages.
Can a contract exclude all consequential damages?
Commercial agreements frequently exclude consequential damages. Whether such an exclusion is enforceable depends on the contract language, governing law, and the circumstances of the transaction.
What types of losses are typically classified as consequential damages?
Common examples include lost profits, lost business opportunities, loss of goodwill, and losses caused by downstream failures that result from the breach. The specific classification depends on the facts and applicable law.
How does a consequential damages exclusion interact with a liability cap?
A contract may contain both a liability cap and a consequential damages exclusion. The two provisions operate differently: the cap limits the total amount recoverable, while the exclusion eliminates certain categories of damages entirely. Both should be read together.
Have a Contract Using These Provisions?
Contract language operates as part of the agreement as a whole.
Contract Review by a Licensed Attorney — Starting at $150
Upload Your Contract & Get a Quote